Trump and KGB Part 4: Trump, KGB, and the Mob: Where Lines Blur

Tracking Trump and KGB 1991-2016

In February, former KGB officer Alnur Mussayev ignited a firestorm with his claim that the KGB recruited Donald Trump in 1987 and gave him the code name “Krasnov.” I have provided analysis of those allegations in previous “Trump and KGB” installments. The key findings thus far are that in the 1970s, Trump was on the radar of Czech intelligence from the time of his marriage to Ivana Zelnickova in 1977 — there is no doubt whatsoever that this was the case. There is also no doubt that Trump was on the radar of the KGB in 1987, that his trip to Moscow that year was largely orchestrated by Soviet officials, and that the KGB had ‘hands-on’ access to him throughout that visit. In the immediate aftermath, Trump took the unusual step of spending $100,000 on full-page newspaper ads in the New York Times, Washington Post, and Boston Globe — ads that criticized U.S. defense spending and foreign aid to allies, echoing long-standing Soviet talking points.

So up to this point, the trajectory of Trump’s engagement with Russian intelligence is fairly straightforward: there is no hard proof of recruitment, but there is abundant evidence of interest, access, and attempts by the KGB to shape or influence him. That much serves as the background for today’s post.

The 1990s and Beyond — Trump, the KGB, and the Mob

Once the story moves into the 1990s, the landscape shifts dramatically. First, the Soviet Union collapses. In its place arises the Russian Federation, marked by political chaos, oligarchic capitalism, and the emergence of a kleptocratic elite. The KGB is dissolved and replaced by the FSB, but many of the same individuals remain — now operating with fewer ideological constraints and greater economic ambition.

This period saw Russian state functions interwoven with organized crime. Former KGB officers became bankers, businessmen, and brokers of black-market influence. Intelligence and criminality blurred. Meanwhile, Russian capital began to flow into luxury markets in the West — including real estate — as oligarchs sought to protect and launder their wealth.

On Trump’s side, the 1990s were a financial disaster. Between 1991 and 2004, Trump’s businesses filed for bankruptcy six times. American banks largely stopped lending to him. Desperate for capital, he turned to foreign investors — and Russian money, both clean and dirty, was plentiful.

It’s in this context — the convergence of post-Soviet intelligence-mafia hybridization and Trump’s financial vulnerability — that the next phase of the story unfolds. And here the question becomes harder, more ambiguous, and more challenging to assess:

Was Trump’s relationship with Russian mob figures simply mutually beneficial “shady business practice” by a desperately struggling tycoon and a rising criminal state? Or was it something more — a long-game intelligence operation hidden behind the veil of real estate and shell companies? Is Trump merely a corrupt businessman drawn into the Russian underworld for financial survival — or is he a conscious asset, handled and controlled by Russian intelligence using the mafia as a cutout?

Let’s break this down.

Backstory: The KGB and Trump 1987-1991

Just to refresh on what immediately preceded the fall of the Soviet Union: Trump’s rise coincided with a period of Soviet strategic outreach toward Western influencers. After marrying Ivana Zelnickova, a Czech model, Trump came under surveillance by Czechoslovakia’s intelligence service (StB), which often shared files with the KGB. By the time Trump visited Moscow in 1987 — a trip arranged by Soviet officials — the KGB had marked him as a target of interest.

Former KGB officer Yuri Shvets and others have claimed that the 1987 trip was a textbook cultivation maneuver. As an intelligence officer assessing this, I would certainly agree. The whole trip was almost certainly organized and carried out by Soviet intelligence. As noted above, upon his return, Trump took out full-page ads criticizing NATO and U.S. foreign aid — positions remarkably consistent with Soviet talking points at the time. Mussayev claims that these ads were trumpeted in an internal KGB circular memorandum as a significant active measures success, and indeed, it is difficult to imagine that these ads occurred independently and without influence by the KGB on Trump.

But the ads also point to an alternative to the “recruitment” claim — because it also feeds into the “cultivation” theory that the Soviets didn’t need to “recruit” Trump in the traditional sense. He was susceptible to flattery, influence, and ideological mimicry — a perfect target for what the KGB called an agent of influence who might or might not be fully witting KGB. It is easy to imagine that during the Moscow trip, Trump was constantly flattered regarding his unique vision; his business acumen; his ability to see past the ‘hangups’ that plagued US attitudes toward the USSR; and that he had the makings of a great political leader. It’s easy to see how all of that, plus persistent and persuasive presentation of Russian talking points to Trump, could have led to Trump placing the ads without “recruitment” having occurred.

The Mob and the Money (1991–2016)

After the Soviet Union collapsed, the old KGB guard didn’t vanish — they privatized. Many turned to organized crime. Figures like Semion Mogilevich, a known Russian mafia boss, expanded their global networks. At the same time, Trump’s businesses were in crisis.

Craig Unger and others argue that throughout the 1990s and 2000s, Trump’s real estate empire became a vehicle for laundering Russian money. One cited example is Semion Kislin — a business associate of Trump’s who had ties to both the Russian mob and Soviet intelligence. Kislin co-founded Trans Commodities, which supplied materials to the Soviet Union and later maintained a financial presence in New York’s Brighton Beach, a known hub for Russian mobsters. He reportedly sold electronics to Soviet clients with government ties, and was on Rudy Giuliani’s mayoral campaign finance committee, creating a web of political and criminal interconnections.

Felix Sater, another key figure, was a convicted felon tied to Mogilevich and worked for Bayrock Group — a firm that operated out of Trump Tower and partnered with Trump on multiple deals, including the failed Trump SoHo project. Sater’s criminal record includes a conviction for a $40 million stock fraud scheme involving members of the Russian mafia. He later claimed to have cooperated with U.S. intelligence, assisting in efforts to track al-Qaeda financing and even nuclear materials. But his proximity to Trump — including having office space just a floor below Trump’s — is less about counterterrorism and more about Bayrock’s real estate deals, many of which involved buyers with opaque financial backgrounds, shell companies, and all the classic hallmarks of money laundering.

Trump’s properties, particularly in Florida and Manhattan, saw a wave of high-end purchases by shell companies and anonymous LLCs originating from Russia and former Soviet republics. A Reuters investigation found that at least 63 buyers with Russian passports or addresses bought $98.4 million worth of real estate in seven Trump-branded luxury towers in South Florida alone. These transactions are legal on paper — but they bear the financial fingerprints of classic laundering: cash deals, anonymity, inflated prices, and a lack of interest in long-term residency.

In total, Trump’s survival as a business entity in the post-bankruptcy 1990s and early 2000s appears to have been underwritten by an influx of foreign capital — much of it of dubious origin, and much of it Russian.

The Unresolved Gap

This is where the narrative gets complicated. Those who wish to portray Trump as a controlled Russian asset generally assert that there was no effective line to be drawn beween Russian mobsters and Russian intelligence, and that therefore Trump’s deep ties to the Russian mob can only be interpreted one way — as ties to Russian intelligence. And to be fair, the lines between the Russian mafia and FSB are clear: Russian intelligence tolerates, protects, and uses the mafia to extend its reach.

But the leap from shady financial entanglements to active intelligence asset — remains speculative.

I have looked at this in some considerable detail. The alignment between Trump and Russian mob money is clear — Russian mob money saved his empire at a time when it was teetering on the brink of collapse. And it is clear that known intelligence-adjacent figures (like Kislin and Sater) were in his orbit.. And it is also an observable fact that Trump’s rhetoric consistently aligned with Russian strategic interests throughout this period and beyond.

But does that make him an agent?

I would say that at most, it would be a ‘possibility not to be excluded’ but other explanations seem more likely, more probable.

A More Likely Model: Useful Idiot with a Golden Ego

From the Russian perspective, Trump didn’t need to be recruited. He only needed to be steered. His financial desperation, narcissism, and appetite for flattery made him an ideal unwitting partner — someone who would echo Kremlin goals without needing orders. As long as he was flattered and fed favors in the form of purchases of his real estate (something that benefitted both Trump and the mob buyers), he could be guided along a path that aligned with Russian interests.

A Model That Fits with Soviet Tradecraft

It is this model that, I believe, best defines the relationship between 1991-2016. This model fits with Soviet tradecraft. Agents of influence often didn’t know they were being used. They believed they were acting independently. That’s part of what made them effective. Soviet and later Russian intelligence operations have long sought to use "active measures" tactics to shape public opinion, policy, and elite behavior in target countries. As documented in former KGB archivist Vasili Mitrokhin's files and by defectors like Yuri Bezmenov and Oleg Kalugin, the KGB’s strategy was often to identify individuals with power, access, or platform — and guide them through subtle nudges, financial enticements, or ideological grooming—without formalizing a recruitment.

Kalugin, a former KGB general, once described agents of influence as "the most effective, because the agent doesn’t even have to know he’s an agent. He simply thinks he’s acting in his own interests — but those interests have been carefully cultivated." This tactic blurred the line between asset and ally, enabling plausible deniability for both parties. This model seems to me to be a much more likely fit for Trump than a formal recruitment model.

The success of such operations was measured not by covert communication or obedience to orders, but by outcome: Did the individual adopt views or make decisions that aligned with Soviet (or later Russian) strategic goals? If so, recruitment was not necessary. Influence was sufficient.

A Curious Duality that Matters

One other dimension of this is worth pointing out. In Soviet doctrine, the “agent of influence” was someone who influenced public discourse in the target country — but the KGB often selected individuals who could themselves be influenced without knowing it. The manipulation cut both ways. These agents thought they were persuading the world on their own terms, unaware that their motivations, finances, and even ideological positions were being subtly steered by handlers behind the scenes. In that sense, influence was both the product and the process.

Conclusion: Living With Ambiguity

Was Trump recruited? Probably not. Was he being influenced by Russian intelligence during the priod 1991-2016 in a way that affected his world view and his decisions? Likely yes. So while “recruited agent” may not apply, at a minimum, Trump is a case study in how financial entanglements, ego manipulation, and compromised judgment can create a person who behaves like an asset — even if no one ever recruited him.

Next up in this series: Trump and KGB: 2016 and Beyond.

---